Tuesday, August 16, 2011

WE ARE 17 YEARS INTO OUR DEMOCRACY: August 2011

There is a sense of discomfort as we approach 20 years of our democracy. At 17 years into our democracy, we are nearing the period when panic begins and people start to take a hard look at economic gains made or not made.

Former President Mbeki once said "As a consequence of the victories we have registered during our first ten years of freedom, we have laid a firm foundation for the new advances we must and will make during the next decade." Keep this in mind as we look into some of the recent developments in South Africa.

Post 17 years since our political freedom, don’t we hear voices from a distance urging us to get on with “new advances” as advocated by former President Mbeki when we were only 10 years into our political freedom? Seemingly, the voices are calling for economic freedom or emancipation.

I do not wish, at all, to be part of the chorus on privatization mainly because it sounds like a choir with no conductor. What I want to be part of is a sober but urgent discussion that accepts that South Africa has not made the economic gains for all its citizens as was expected in 1994.

The prerogative of our struggle was political freedom. Our Bill of Rights originates, in its preamble, with " We, the people of South Africa, recognising the injustices of our past..."

It continues to state the values that include "human dignity; all adults will be able to vote; there will be regular elections..., etc". It is clear and understandable that our constitution was mainly concerned with restoration of our dignity and entrenching our political rights.

There seems to be a belief that political stability is one “…of the victories we have registered…”. The question now is whether a lot of the “noises” are not arising from those who believe that it’s now time for economic emancipation.

There are a number of questions which will be asked, amongst them being whether the various pieces of legislation which sought to empower previously disadvantaged people are not adequate.

I seem to hear a response that says so far we have been tinkering in the periphery and now it’s time for a comprehensive economic struggle. There can no longer be a piecemeal and half-hearted approach but a whole movement needs to be behind the economic revolution.

The problem of not having a comprehensive approach is that we will have disjointed and uncoordinated noises, like those that are happening around privatization. Each group will seek to protect their current positions rather than to conduct honest assessments no matter how hard it is.

I hear voices, that sadly will not be silenced soon, that say there is a need, and an urgent one for that matter, for the economic freedom to begin now. Let us ignore the noise but we must please listen carefully to the voices.

Sango Ntsaluba